Sony FE 24-70 GM f2.8 $1998 Sony FE 70-200 GM f2.8 $2398. That totals: $8,092. That [edit] is 5972 Pounds Sterling.. and the Nikons, at least the 70-200, are optically superior if not by a huge margin. Cheap glass will come to Z mount, and in the meantime their f4 zooms are also excellent. Panasonic S1 Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM Panasonic S Pro 70-200mm F4 OIS Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM +3 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
Now I keep seeing used 135L lenses for just over half that price. The 135L is about the same size and weight as the new RF 70-200. For portraits the two stop advantage would be welcome. And for dance recitals, obviously f2 is better than f4 in low light. I could add it to my kit and not have to sell my EF 70-200. I'm really wary of any used lens.
I finally get to do a Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 review on both the Canon R and Canon R6. My opinion may surprise you since I haven't been a huge user of the EF
各位前輩大家好,小弟前個禮拜入手了EOS R,目前正在挑選70-200mm這個焦段的變焦鏡,預算只能買F4。原本已經看好要買RF版本的,但看了很多評測後發現小小白兔還是CP值很高的選擇。不過我沒有EF轉RF口的轉接環所以要另購,不過一起買下來還是可以便宜RF 70-200 F4(Canon單眼相機 第1頁) Some clients might even have the impression that a bigger lens is more professional. Renew non-IS version of EF 70-200 F2.8/L also costs less than 1/3 the price of the RF version. BTW EF versions also have the advantage of allowing teleconverters to be attached. FZKPMCi. 263 241 147 193 115 204 26 343 308

canon rf 70 200 f4 vs f2 8